Knowledge. Understand the rules, then the challenge.

A prop-firm challenge is a paid evaluation, not a brokerage balance of your own. If you only read the profit target, you miss half the contract. These pages are about the small type: drawdown, consistency, payouts, and who is actually selling you what.

The large number on the dashboard is easy to grasp. The moving floor underneath needs more attention. In the $50k futures example you pay $525, work with a nominal account size of $50,000, and at the start have $2,500 of room to the loss limit. Those are three different numbers — and none of them is a guarantee of profit.

Start with Evaluation if the setup is still unclear. Recalculate the drawdown before you compare programs. Read Payouts before you plan around a payment. Tax and legal questions you settle with qualified advice, not with a discount code. Guides written for traders in Germany are marked as such.

The calculators are teaching examples, not trading instructions. Industry rates have a source and a denominator; operator statements remain operator statements. I operate Iceberg Funding myself and disclose that conflict of interest. These pages help you ask questions — not buy blindly.

Passed is not paid

100 buyers → roughly 14 pass → roughly 7 receive a payout. Industry illustration, not Iceberg results.

Industry illustration / 100 fee buyers
100

buy an evaluation

≈14

pass the challenge (≈14%)

≈7

receive a payout (≈7% of all buyers)

An illustrative order of magnitude from reported FPFX data. Not internal Iceberg figures, and not a probability of success for you. Finance Magnates cites different rates from another survey; those are not mixed in here.

Source: TradeInformer / FPFX interview

A different survey — do not add them together: Finance Magnates reports for The Funded Trader 5–10% passing and about 20% of those paid out. That works out to about 1–2% of all buyers. Different data basis; no personal forecast of success.

Source: Finance Magnates · The Funded Trader